Answer :
A key part of that legal framework is Section 230 of the communications decency act of 1996, which protects online platforms from legal action based on content from third parties.
According to Section 230 of the laws, no user or provider of an interactive computer service may be regarded as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content source (47 U.S.C. 230). In other words, internet intermediaries that host or republish speech are exempt from a number of laws that could otherwise be used to hold them legally liable for what others say and do.
The term "interactive computer service providers" broadly refers to any online service that disseminates content from third parties as well as the conventional Internet Service Providers (ISPs), which together make up the protected intermediaries.
Learn more about communications decency act at:
brainly.com/question/28484029
#SPJ4
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is a clause that provides immunity to online platforms from being held liable for the content published by their users. It effectively shields websites from lawsuits if a user posts something illegal, although there are exemptions for certain federal criminal laws and intellectual property claims. This section has been pivotal in the growth of the internet by allowing platforms to host user-generated content without fear of getting sued for what their users say or do.
The impetus behind Section 230 was the recognition by lawmakers that holding online platforms accountable for user content would impose an untenable burden on these companies, potentially stifling free speech and hindering the growth of online services. It covers a broad spectrum of online entities, from social media companies to forums and blogs. However, it has also faced criticism for allowing harmful content to proliferate without sufficient mechanisms for accountability. Due to its critical role and controversial stance, Section 230 has become a hotbed of debate on the balance between internet freedom and the need for content moderation and legal responsibility.