Answer :
Final answer:
A police officer must have reasonable suspicion that an individual is armed and dangerous before conducting a frisk. This standard is established by the Supreme Court case, Terry v. Ohio. It is important to note that reasonable suspicion is a lower threshold than probable cause.
Explanation:
Requirements for Police Frisking
Before a police officer may conduct a frisk of an individual, the officer must have reasonable suspicion that the individual is armed and dangerous. This principle is rooted in the Supreme Court's decision in Terry v. Ohio (1968), which established that police may stop and frisk individuals on the street if they believe that person is involved in criminal activity and poses a threat.
The criteria for reasonable suspicion are as follows:
- Reasonable suspicion that the individual is armed and dangerous
- Reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot
- Reasonable suspicion that the individual possesses evidence of a crime
However, the most pertinent factor specifically related to frisking is the suspicion that the person is armed and poses a risk to the officer or others. The standard of reasonable suspicion is lower than the probable cause threshold, which is required for more invasive searches.
Learn more about frisking and reasonable suspicion here:
https://brainly.com/question/31808270