Answer :
Ed and BU agree to an agreement, yet the agreement isn't endorsed by the two players and is in this manner unenforceable. The Statute of Fraud is a legal doctrine that requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed to be enforceable in court.
The option (C) is correct.
In this case, while Ed and BU have an agreement that Ed will pay Ted's tuition if Ted is unable to do so, the contract is not in writing and lacks the required signatures. Therefore, it falls within the Statute of Frauds, making the contract unenforceable in a court of law.
To make the agreement legally binding and enforceable, it would need to be put in writing and signed by both parties or their authorized representatives.
Learn more about agreement:
https://brainly.com/question/34936622
#SPJ4
Final answer:
The statute of frauds requires that certain types of contracts be in writing and signed by the party to be charged. If Ed and BU have an agreement, but it is not in writing or not signed by both of them, the contract is unenforceable under the statute of frauds. If they haven't agreed to a contract, the statute does not apply. So, the correct answer is B. Ed and BU agree to a contract, but it is not in writing and is therefore unenforceable.
Explanation:
The question posed is regarding the statute of frauds in a legal context, which refers to the requirement that certain kinds of contracts be memorialized in a writing, signed by the party to be charged, in order to be enforceable.
In this case, whether Ed's promise to B U Y to cover Ted's tuition if Ted cannon falls within the statute of frauds depends on the specific details of the agreement.
Option A suggests there's no agreement or contract between Ed and BU, hence the statute of frauds doesn't apply because there's no contract to enforce.
Thus, this would not be within the statute of frauds requirement.
Option B and Option C indicate that while there is an agreement between Ed and BU, it's not in written form and not signed by both parties respectively.
Both of these situations would make the contract unenforceable under the statute of frauds, as the statute requires an agreement to be in writing and signed by the party to be charged with the contract.
Therefore, they are both within the statute of frauds and would be unenforceable due to non-compliance with these requirements.
he Statute of Frauds is a legal doctrine that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable.
While the specific requirements for a written contract can vary by jurisdiction, there are some common elements that generally apply.
In the scenario you described, where Ed promises to pay Ted's tuition if Ted is unable to do so, this would typically be considered a contract between Ed and BU (presumably a university).
Whether it falls within the Statute of Frauds depends on the specific legal requirements in your jurisdiction, but in many cases, it might not require a written contract.
Here are the possible options
A. Ed and BU do not agree to a contract:
If Ed and BU do not enter into any form of agreement, there's no contract to consider.
The Statute of Frauds would not apply in this case because there is no contract at all.
B. Ed and BU agree to a contract, but it is not in writing and is therefore unenforceable:
In some cases, an oral contract might be enforceable, but the Statute of Frauds can make certain types of agreements unenforceable if they are not in writing. However, whether this specific promise to pay tuition falls under the Statute of Frauds can depend on the laws of your jurisdiction. In some cases, a promise like this may not require a written agreement.
C. Ed and BU agree to a contract, but the contract is not signed by both parties and is therefore unenforceable:
The requirement for both parties to sign a contract can also vary by jurisdiction and the nature of the contract. In some cases, a written contract may not require the signatures of both parties to be enforceable, while in other cases, it may be necessary.
It's important to consult with a legal professional in your jurisdiction to determine the specific requirements and enforceability of the contract in question.
The application of the Statute of Frauds can vary from place to place, and it's crucial to understand the local legal context. So, the correct answer is B. Ed and BU agree to a contract, but it is not in writing and is therefore unenforceable.
Learn more about Statute of Frauds
https://brainly.com/question/30409098
#SPJ11